Bill D'Arcy_his innocence is well documented

The Supporters Group
Bill D'Arcy supporters consist of

1. Those who believe, because of the extensive pre-trial publicity, that Bill D'Arcy had no chance of a fair trial. And/or

2. Those who believe, because of a plethora of uncorroborated "evidence", contradictory allegations and conflicting "evidence", he should never have been found guilty. And/or

3. Those who believe that because of evidence given at the trials, evidence suppressed by the police, and evidence which has been clarified or uncovered since, that he was not guilty of any offence even the lesser charges. And/or

4, Those who believe that the consistent refusal of all government and legal authorities to ignore Bill D'Arcy's request for an independent enquiry into his case, given the circumstances, is reprehensible.


The first and main trial of Bill D'Arcy was held during a time of "hysteria-mania" and a two year period of prejudical pre-trial publicity. Evidence at the trial itself now carefully analysed - and evidence obtained since, conclusively prove that Bill D'Arcy should not have been convicted of anything. Dangerously for our society, the ethos has developed that a man accused of abhorent sexual crimes against children, must prove himself innocent.

An analysis (without names) of the hole-in-the-wall statements of prosecution witnesses whose evidence convicted Bill D'Arcy of lesser charges. These lesser charges had the effect on the jury of indirectly supporting the uncorroborated charge of rape. Currently in Preparation.

1. Botting Judgment in the civil proceedings disallowing the accusers from gaining $250,000 and ruling in favour of the D'Arcys - awarding costs to the D'Arcys (never paid!)

2. Letter of Dr O'Connor on the impossibility of the rape accusations against D'Arcy