Documents proving miscarriage of justice
The first and main trial of Bill D'Arcy was held during a time of "hysteria-mania" and a two year period of prejudical pre-trial publicity. Evidence at the trial itself now carefully analysed - and evidence obtained since, conclusively prove that Bill D'Arcy should not have been convicted of anything. Dangerously for our society, the ethos has developed that man accused of abhorent sexual crimes against children must prove himself innocent.
An analysis (without names) of the hole-in-the-wall statements of prosecution witnesses whose evidence convicted Bill D'Arcy of lesser charges, thus indirectly supporting the uncorroborated charge of rape as well.